It looks like you're using Internet Explorer 11 or older. This website works best with modern browsers such as the latest versions of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge. If you continue with this browser, you may see unexpected results.
Resources about Oregon Tribes: Southwest
Resources from the State Library focused on the tribes of Oregon.
Kalapuya ethnology / Notes by Frachtenberg about his informants: Grace Wheeler, (Kalapuya), Frank Boyd (Yamhill), Louise Selkeah (Yamhill), Mose Hudson / Yamhill notebooks, Grande Ronde Reservation, Oregon, 1913, 1914.
Part 1. Santiam Kalapuya ethnologic texts / by Melville Jacobs -- Part 2. Santiam Kalapuya myth texts / by Melville Jacobs -- Part 3. Kalapuya texts / by L. J. Frachtenberg, A.S. Gatschet, Melville Jacobs.
This indispensable guide and reference work offers an overview of the South Coast's rich history, from prehistory to the present. It describes key historic sites from the California/Oregon border to Heceta Head, including buildings, towns, museums, state parks, roads, natural areas, archaeological sites, shipwrecks, and lighthouses.
In 1855 the Coos, Lower Umpqua, and Siuslaw tribes of Oregon signed the Empire Treaty with the United States, which would have provided them rights as federally acknowledged tribes with formal relationships with the U.S. government. The treaty, however, was never ratified by Congress; in fact, the federal government lost the document. Tribal leaders spent the next century battling to overcome their quasi-recognized status, receiving some federal services for Indians but no compensation for the land and resources they lost. In 1956 the U.S. government officially terminated their tribal status as part of a national effort to eliminate the government’s relationship with Indian tribes. These tribes vehemently opposed termination yet were not consulted in this action. nbsp; In Seeking Recognition, David R. M. Beck examines the termination and eventual restoration of the Confederated Tribes at Coos, Lower Umpqua, and Siuslaw some thirty years later, in 1984. Within this historical context, the termination and restoration of the tribes take on new significance. These actions did not take place in a historical vacuum but were directly connected with the history of the tribe’s efforts to gain U.S. government recognition from the very beginning of their relations.